𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 𝘃𝘀. 𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗛𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁

𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗧𝗣𝗔𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗮𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁.

Claims come in, PPO contracts are applied, discounts are calculated, and payments are issued timely. Notes are documented. Compliance requirements are satisfied.

𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘺.

𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴.

I was recently reviewing a large stop-loss claimant and noticed several high-dollar hospital claims where the “negotiated discount” was only 4%.

𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺 𝗲𝘅𝗰𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗱 $𝟭𝟭𝟭,𝟬𝟬𝟬.

𝗔𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗲𝘅𝗰𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗱 $𝟮𝟳,𝟬𝟬𝟬.

𝗕𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗲𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝗮 𝟰% 𝗿𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻.

𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁! 🤮

To be fair, the TPA may have administered the claims exactly according to the PPO agreement. The claims may have been processed accurately. The payments may have been timely. Operationally, they may have done everything correctly.

But if you are the employer funding the health plan — or the stop-loss carrier absorbing catastrophic risk — you eventually have to ask a more important question:

𝗪𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲?

Because a 4% discount on a six-figure hospital bill is difficult to characterize as meaningful cost containment.

𝘌𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘴𝘦𝘵.

It means pausing before payment and asking:

• Is this bill reasonable?
• Is there additional negotiation leverage beyond the PPO contract?
• Has the claim been reviewed by an independent FWA or bill review vendor?
• What multiple of Medicare does this claim represent?
• What is the hospital’s estimated cost-to-charge ratio?
• Does the employer have true contractual obligation to pay this amount, or simply access to the PPO discount?
• Are we paying this because it is correct… or because it is easy?

𝗧𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿, 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗧𝗣𝗔𝘀.

Many administrators operate within contractual, network, legal, and timing constraints that make aggressive claim intervention difficult. And in many cases, they are performing exactly the function they were hired to perform.

But employers should understand the distinction between administrative efficiency and financial effectiveness.

Fast processing matters. Contract compliance matters. Provider relationships matter.

𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘁𝗼𝗼.

And sometimes the most valuable thing a claims team can do is slow the process down long enough to challenge whether the outcome itself makes sense.

𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗽-𝗹𝗼𝘀𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗲-𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗲𝗻𝗱. Experience matters…

𝘕𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 — 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘺 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘦 𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘦.

Someone still has to evaluate the broader financial picture and determine whether the employer group and the carrier received the best outcome reasonably available under the circumstances.

𝗜𝗻 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆’𝘀 𝗲𝗻𝘃𝗶𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗶𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝘀𝗰𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘆, 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝘃𝗲r.

#StopLoss #SelfFunded #HealthcareFinance #CostContainment #EmployeeBenefits